Why ignoring the name that some of these moves have already for a large number of CV, like Kirin for FD and Phoenix for WA; and why ignoring that several of these names of piece are associated with different moves, like Elephant for FA (and several others, but not yours), Hawk for ADGH, Frog for FH, Kangaroo for NA (see Piececlopedia for some of them)?
I can understand when the author wants to fit with a given thematic but I don't think it is the case here. So, I don't see the added value of confusing people with different names and moves than what they are used to. Or I'm missing something important.
Why ignoring the name that some of these moves have already for a large number of CV, like Kirin for FD and Phoenix for WA; and why ignoring that several of these names of piece are associated with different moves, like Elephant for FA (and several others, but not yours), Hawk for ADGH, Frog for FH, Kangaroo for NA (see Piececlopedia for some of them)?
I can understand when the author wants to fit with a given thematic but I don't think it is the case here. So, I don't see the added value of confusing people with different names and moves than what they are used to. Or I'm missing something important.