it is not necessary to build the in-check dependence into the move list of the King that is used when the argumet to the K or k function is 0.
I don't understand this part. Is it about the number at the end of the K definition? I had the checked check there because the normal King move (with castling and leaping) had different numbers.
I don't understand this part. Is it about the number at the end of the K definition? I had the checked check there because the normal King move (with castling and leaping) had different numbers.