H. G. Muller wrote on Fri, May 14, 2021 10:27 AM UTC:
This interesting variant featured some pieces for which no XBetza notation existed.
Namely a lame Slip-Rook and Slip-Bishop, sliding only an odd number of steps.
I now made the diagram understand notations jnAA,
with A a distant leaper atom,
as a lame rider with the given basic leap,
with an elongated first step.
As many pieces promote, and only in an (optional) predetermined way,
I used Shogi-style promotion for this diagram.
As a result the automatically generated piece list to the right of the diagram does not list all pieces;
it only lists the unpromoted forms, and shows the correspondin promoted forms after a second click.
The images used in the article's original diagram for Gryphon and Anchorite were not available in the 35x35 set I used for this diagram.
I used the standard image for Gryphon and a Rhino instead.
The article did not specify any pictograms for the promoted pieces that are not in the start position,
so I improvised there.
This interesting variant featured some pieces for which no XBetza notation existed. Namely a lame Slip-Rook and Slip-Bishop, sliding only an odd number of steps. I now made the diagram understand notations jnAA, with A a distant leaper atom, as a lame rider with the given basic leap, with an elongated first step.
As many pieces promote, and only in an (optional) predetermined way, I used Shogi-style promotion for this diagram. As a result the automatically generated piece list to the right of the diagram does not list all pieces; it only lists the unpromoted forms, and shows the correspondin promoted forms after a second click. The images used in the article's original diagram for Gryphon and Anchorite were not available in the 35x35 set I used for this diagram. I used the standard image for Gryphon and a Rhino instead. The article did not specify any pictograms for the promoted pieces that are not in the start position, so I improvised there.
GraTiA