@Bn Em. I fear a miscommunication. Sorry, English is not my mother language, you sentence is long and not direct enough for my poor English >> I"m not sure about what you mean.
What I know or understand:
Cavalier in Renn Chess, Greenwood: is F-then-R or R-then-F, but not an adjacent
Cavalier in Mideast according to Pritchard: it is the same than above.
Cavalier in Mideast according to Hans: is F-then-R or W-then-B, but not an adjacent
I said that Greenwood took the Cavalier from Mideast, and this is true only if Pritchard is right and Hans is wrong.
Pritchard seemed to be quite certain of what he wrote because he said that then the Cavalier has always two paths to reach a square.
My point is not an offense to my friend Hans, of course.
Maybe worth to mention that there are two versions of the move depending on the source.
@Bn Em. I fear a miscommunication. Sorry, English is not my mother language, you sentence is long and not direct enough for my poor English >> I"m not sure about what you mean.
What I know or understand:
I said that Greenwood took the Cavalier from Mideast, and this is true only if Pritchard is right and Hans is wrong. Pritchard seemed to be quite certain of what he wrote because he said that then the Cavalier has always two paths to reach a square.
My point is not an offense to my friend Hans, of course.
Maybe worth to mention that there are two versions of the move depending on the source.