Greg Strong wrote on Wed, Apr 24, 2019 03:46 PM UTC:
On vacation with only a phone so I can't type a long response. I'm sorry, but I am not in favor of this idea. ChessV expects pieces to have the same notation for both players (except for case.) It would require a lot of changes to change that. I don't mind changing things if there is a good reason but I don't like to complicate the system just to benefit one game. I am doubtful this has any real advantage outside CwDA. I think two letter notations would be best, but I understand that could be a radical change (needing to code in understanding of the prefix.) I can live with heavy use of the suffixes.
On vacation with only a phone so I can't type a long response. I'm sorry, but I am not in favor of this idea. ChessV expects pieces to have the same notation for both players (except for case.) It would require a lot of changes to change that. I don't mind changing things if there is a good reason but I don't like to complicate the system just to benefit one game. I am doubtful this has any real advantage outside CwDA. I think two letter notations would be best, but I understand that could be a radical change (needing to code in understanding of the prefix.) I can live with heavy use of the suffixes.