Greg Strong wrote on Sat, Jan 29, 2011 12:59 AM UTC:
I've been reading almost every post on this site for about eight years now except for a couple of brief gaps. While I must say that while George Duke has never angered me, nor have I found him particularly disruptive, I must agree 100% that many, many of his posts are completely without meaning. In the beginning, I figured that, given their complexity, they had some valuable insight if only I could untangle the riddle. So I read, reread, and re-re-read, and eventually was forced to conclude that there was, in fact, no real meaning at all.
I appologize if I'm butting in, but since I did put a significant amount of effort into interpreting his posts once upon a time, I feel like it's worthwhile to mention that I came up dry...
I've been reading almost every post on this site for about eight years now except for a couple of brief gaps. While I must say that while George Duke has never angered me, nor have I found him particularly disruptive, I must agree 100% that many, many of his posts are completely without meaning. In the beginning, I figured that, given their complexity, they had some valuable insight if only I could untangle the riddle. So I read, reread, and re-re-read, and eventually was forced to conclude that there was, in fact, no real meaning at all.
I appologize if I'm butting in, but since I did put a significant amount of effort into interpreting his posts once upon a time, I feel like it's worthwhile to mention that I came up dry...