Carlos Cetina wrote on Fri, Oct 16, 2009 06:15 PM UTC:
Jeremy, what about this slight change:
10 m m e c ? k c e m m
9 . . i e e e e i . .
8 . . . . . . . . . .
7 . . . . . . . . . .
6 . . . . . . . . . .
5 . . . . . . . . . .
4 . . . . . . . . . .
3 . . . . . . . . . .
2 . . I E E E E I . .
1 M M E C K ? C E M M
a b c d e f g h i j
E/e = Tripper 3-3
M/m = Conmuter 4-4
I/i = Threeleaper 3-0
C/c = Fourleaper 4-0
K/k = King
? = piece pendent to determine: another leaper? ...which?; would work there a nightrider or a queen?; why not an alfil/dababa that is also a leaper [2-2, 2-0]?