Single Comment

Here the correct answer to #4 18.July about Conway's Angel relates to Gilman's request! Well, the ONLY leaping pieces that can elude the Angel are precisely from Rustler (11.4), Equivocator (11.6), FlyByNight (11.8), Mamel (11.9) and Irregular (11.10). No others will work. [Do they need compound between them to explain #4?] And Charles Gilman only just named those jumpers this month 29.June.2009 at M&B03:_ eleven-leapers _ This test question was constructed after Gilman's *most recent* nomenclative expansion -- deliberately thinking about application of these newest piece-types! He needs to continue so to fill in the gaps. The essential naming has value 100:1 over most tired new rules sets, being up couple levels of abstraction. Admittedly all M&Bxx may take year 2009 and 2010 (the M&B05 one comment is very preliminary) with patience for these side-topics, like Soma Chess. (Soma Chess, like Duke's Baseball Chess or Betza's Chess Unequal Armies, would have millions of permutations in brief economical presentation) I can handle duplicate naming too, as Gilman simplified systematically Knappen's clumsy names here below of Nachtmahr. We can all keep OrthoChess and nouveau-fairy Chess in separate symbiotic realms. If you please, there is all the time in the world, but little patience with -- diametrically opposite to a Gilman or a Knappen -- the Joycean group promoting superficiality in research, priority, and history, for their selfish artwork. The latter approach would mean being stuck in a rut another 15 years. //Mere Flamingo(1,6) is captured in 2 or 3 depending on position, let alone 20, so #4 is True.