Jeremy Good wrote on Thu, Aug 23, 2007 12:12 PM UTC:
I like your idea, David of combining two squares.
I think it would be a shame to let go of the tradition of squares. Now, I'm a little confused by some of the comments that have been made here on that subject. Was there a 45 square contest that was initiated and then dropped midway? If so what happened to the entries? Or has there never been a 45 square contest initiated?
Joe Joyce suggested having two tournaments, one a continuation of the consecutive sets of squares contest and one another type or combination of types. I like that idea too.
I think it would be a shame to let go of the tradition of squares. Now, I'm a little confused by some of the comments that have been made here on that subject. Was there a 45 square contest that was initiated and then dropped midway? If so what happened to the entries? Or has there never been a 45 square contest initiated?
Joe Joyce suggested having two tournaments, one a continuation of the consecutive sets of squares contest and one another type or combination of types. I like that idea too.