Single Comment

Those are good points, I hadn't realized such problems had arisen in the
past. Hopefully the rules as given this time will help. I suppose we have
to figure that any publicly-judged contest will have somewhat limited
significance.
How would this work, for future contests: in order to submit a judgment
you also have to submit the ZSG of one game that you completed (or played
till one side resigned, or till both sides agreed to a draw, as long as
those decisions appear rational). I would consider playing at least one
game to be the minimum effort required for passing a judgment. Or would
others disagree?