Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

EarliestEarlier Reverse Order LaterLatest
Game Courier Tournament #3. Vote for which games should be in the third Game Courier tournament.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
🕸📝Fergus Duniho wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2007 06:50 PM UTC:
It is not mandatory, but you may if you choose to, especially if you're eager to play more games.

Anonymous wrote on Tue, Mar 27, 2007 03:21 AM UTC:
FYI, Fergus, Greg Strong and I are planning to play Modern Shatranj instead of the slated Cannons of Chesstonia (a name that still hasn't been corrected on the sheet from Cannons of Estonians). - JG

carlos carlos wrote on Sun, Apr 1, 2007 09:06 AM UTC:
avalanche chess = balanced avalanche chess, right?

carlos carlos wrote on Sun, Apr 1, 2007 09:15 AM UTC:
when it comes to this tournament i mean.

Jeremy Good wrote on Sun, Apr 1, 2007 01:48 PM UTC:
'White has a large advantage. White's advantage is reduced in BALANCED AVALANCHE CHESS in which White had no pawn push on the first move.' Given this remark by Avalanche Chess inventor Ralph Betza, I'd agree that would only be fair.

David Paulowich wrote on Sun, Apr 22, 2007 03:23 PM UTC:

Just to let you know, my game with Todor has ended. A majority of the 17 or 18 players are now free for the second round.

BALANCED AVALANCHE CHESS sounds like it might be a good idea. Apparently I no longer have an opponent for this particular chess variant.


carlos carlos wrote on Thu, May 17, 2007 10:06 AM UTC:
fergus or antoine,

if you want to show me or tell me how to set up the games and send them out to people, i'll do it.

David Paulowich wrote on Thu, May 17, 2007 12:07 PM UTC:
PROPOSAL: We start the second round now, for all players. After June 15, any player with only one game going in this tournament starts a second game. [EDIT] Yes, we need to consider the 4 players still engaged in round one.

Jeremy Good wrote on Thu, May 17, 2007 01:48 PM UTC:
David, I really want to object to part of your proposal since I am still very much involved in my first game and nobody else who finished their first game had the same pressure of starting a second game while finishing their first. However, I would be willing to sign on to your June 15th proposal. So while I object to the first part, I am willing to compromise by signing on to the second. [added later: Also, of course I don't mind if people start their second games while I am still working on completing my first.]

Joe Joyce wrote on Thu, May 17, 2007 01:58 PM UTC:
I'll be happy to see the tourney get to the second game. As a bit of info, I played in T#2, and we played 4 games at a time. This way is easier, but longer.

carlos carlos wrote on Thu, May 17, 2007 02:38 PM UTC:
yeah, four games at a time was fine. the time controls are pretty generous.

je ju wrote on Fri, May 18, 2007 05:19 AM UTC:
Get the next round started, for crying out loud.

Jeremy has 23 active games, is averaging one single move every 4 days in his first round game, and wants to play one game at a time.

Estimated time of completion of the tournament?

Let's see, 19 games times roughly 2 months ... summer of 2010?

My proposal (Proposal '2 every 3')

Rounds 2 and 3 should commence by the end of May, with 2 new rounds beginning every 3 weeks.

That'll get this thing wound up near the end of the year.  

All are welcome to refrain from playing in other games (or at least fewer than 23 other games) if unable to find time to focus on their tournament games.

Let's play 2!

Support proposal 2 every 3!!

juan rodriguez wrote on Fri, May 18, 2007 09:04 AM UTC:
I understand Good's caution, he faces me in the next round...

je ju wrote on Fri, May 18, 2007 09:59 AM UTC:
Juan Rodriguez, you are both right and wrong.

Mr. Jeremy Good does face you in his next round.  However, your next round match is actually against Uri Bruck.  

Your match vs. Jeremy Good is your 3rd match.  

It may be possible for you to play both the match versus Uri Bruck and the match versus Jeremy Good at the same time, if it is agreed that we can handle more than one match at a time.

Vote yes on Proposal 2 every 3!

Abdul-Rahman Sibahi wrote on Fri, May 18, 2007 10:11 AM UTC:
i don't really mind ..

juan rodriguez wrote on Fri, May 18, 2007 10:37 AM UTC:
YES!!!

Greg Strong wrote on Fri, May 18, 2007 12:07 PM UTC:
I vote yes!

juan rodriguez wrote on Fri, May 18, 2007 02:10 PM UTC:
Thank you for your support, Greg. Any other affirmations forthcoming?

Jeremy Good wrote on Fri, May 18, 2007 03:15 PM UTC:
' Jeremy...wants to play one game at a time.' -- To be fair: This mischaracterizes the position I stated below.

Joe Joyce wrote on Fri, May 18, 2007 04:16 PM UTC:
I would like to start at least one more game.
An immodest proposal: 
Assign all players 6 months total time in each game.
Start all the games at the beginning of the tourney.
Tournament ends in 1 year.
;-)

David Paulowich wrote on Fri, May 18, 2007 04:37 PM UTC:
There seems to be general agreement that each of us should be playing two games by June 15. Let's make it happen! Right now, most of us are playing zero games.

je ju wrote on Sat, May 19, 2007 12:18 AM UTC:
Jeremy, you're right, you did agree to be playing 2 games at a time from and after June 15th.  

But still, at the pace it's going, we're looking at sometime in 2009.

Maybe I'm just a little anxious to play b/c I got thrashed in a short number of days in my first round game.

Vote Yes on Proposal 2 every 3!

Jeremy Good wrote on Sat, May 19, 2007 09:18 AM UTC:

I did not have any say over the time controls or rate of games to be played or launching of tournament or continuity of games and I don't wish to be cited as a cause in the delay of further games being played. Perhaps my request regarding the first round was unreasonable.

I vote yes to your proposal.

[Added note: Btw, Joe, I love your immodest proposal.]


juan rodriguez wrote on Sun, May 20, 2007 05:05 AM UTC:
YES!!

Adrian Alvarez de la Campa wrote on Sun, May 20, 2007 06:38 AM UTC:
who are we petitioning here? and why exactly haven't any round 2 games been assigned?

25 comments displayed

EarliestEarlier Reverse Order LaterLatest

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.