[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Comments by JaredMcComb
When attempting to use one of the voting pages, I get a screenfull of the following: Warning: main(/home/chessvar/public_html/cgi-bin/rankedpoll/runpoll.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/chessva/public_html/contests/10/poll1-A.php on line 26 Warning: main(/home/chessvar/public_html/cgi-bin/rankedpoll/runpoll.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/chessva/public_html/contests/10/poll1-A.php on line 26 Warning: main(): Failed opening '/home/chessvar/public_html/cgi-bin/rankedpoll/runpoll.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/chessva/public_html/contests/10/poll1-A.php on line 26 Perhaps this should be fixed.
The links to Taratibu and veSQuj seem to be missing. Furthermore, the link to Shatranj Kamil 64 should point to http://www.chessvariants.org/contests/10/shatranjkamil64.html instead of where it does now.
'Ostentatious Chess' sounds like a good name for an upcoming submission of mine. ;)
What's going on, anyway? There's been no announcement of a second round of voting.
I have one as well, but have used it so much that the low-quality included cardboard board is starting to fall apart. Not that I'm selling it, of course -- just be wary you may have to find someplace that will make custom gameboards to replace yours, if you find one used. (The pieces, on the other hand, are lovely. Quite heavy, plastic, and felt-bottomed. Very sturdy.) What's all this about selling the property rights? Hopefully someone interested in selling high-quality sets will purchase it -- in my opinion, Omega Chess is one of the best variants in existence!
How come one player has two GoldenKeyboards and the other player has one each of Golden and Plastic? Was this intentional?
I would think that having each player have two of the same thing would still qualify as different armies, but whatever.
Furthermore the game has 'Chess' in the title. ;)
Probably not too similarly, but it's certainly a good idea. This reminds me, I've been meaning to make a SSBM-styled variant.
The only thing related to 'reclaiming a queen' in Chess is the promotion of a pawn to a queen. For this to happen, the pawn must reach the final row of the board, from its owner's perspective - in other words, get your pawn all the way to the other side of the board, and you can promote it to a queen. (Additionally, the term 'reclaiming' is a bit inaccurate here, because it is possible to get more than one queen by doing this multiple times.)
I have to wonder whether I should be honored for being included in this, or insulted for having something I created be the basis for a section. (Note: this comment is in jest. Kinda.)
Extremely awkward. The Tripper, Commuter, Threeleaper, and Fourleaper (and Lancer, to a lesser extent) are all bound to a small subset of squares on any size board, and the remaining pieces can be difficult to utilize well due to their large and inflexible movement patterns. This is my opinion, of course.
I think it would look best with the colors of the wooden one, but without the texture. Just my two cents.
But but but... the big-eared person with a tie over his nose was just so charming!
Thanks for catching that -- it should be 11 per side. One thing which has just occured to me is that I never defined how much damage Clerics should take -- they're supposed to always take 2 damage (3 if the attacking piece has a same-color bonus) but I apparently never wrote that down anywhere. D'oh. Pieces should be able to move through spaces occupied by friendly pieces only, as in Vantage Master Online, which the game was originally based on. This was also never written down explicitly. Double D'oh. As for the spirit spamming issue, the self-destruct can become valuable in a situation like that -- once your spirit is about to die, you can do extra damage to 'the wall,' and eventually break a hole in it -- if they're really trying to keep up a wall they won't use it themselves, which gives you an advantage. Did you take this into account? (Just the same, I will consider revising the summoning rules.) Is there any way this page could be converted into a 'member-submitted' page so I could edit it?
New (blank) page created here. Please copy the comments over as well, if possible. Thanks!
Er, you can never attack your own pieces -- the description for the action specifies that -- so the only way you can damage your own pieces is to get them caught in a self-destruct's radius. And you can self-destruct with more than zero health, if you like. And the only piece that can heal other pieces is the cleric, and they can only heal one other at a time, so unless they have their cleric behind the wall, the wall will most likely retaliate.
The root-65 leaper is known as the Bat in Leaping/Missing Bat Chess. Sorry.
Is it just my computer or is the diagram a little squooshed?
25 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.