Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Max Koval wrote on Sun, Mar 19, 2023 12:38 AM UTC:

Another formulation of the bishop's move:

  1. Trigonal bishop is counted as an alternating hexagonal rook if the cells of the same color will be converted to vertical hexagons.
  2. In this perspective, the bishop should move only forward, not sideways or otherwise.
  3. And it should not move in a straight hexagonal rook-alike manner with more than two cells in a row to preserve the alternating pattern (for the rook it is a 'built-in' feature).

Why this way? a. The directions of the two sliding pieces are now opposite of each other, similar to chess; b both pieces use the same rule of movement; c since the bishop has 6 nearby 'diagonal' cells, unlike the rook with 3 orthogonal, it should have 12 directions of movement, not 6 like it was featured in other variants since rook already has 6. So, I think that the way the bishop moves is quite natural from the rook's perspective. The board is also naturally colored, and the pieces are arranged in a way similar to orthodox chess.

I feel that I may miss something, and I would be glad if someone could disprove this idea.


Edit Form

Comment on the page Trigonal Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.