Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
H. G. Muller wrote on Mon, Feb 20, 2023 06:17 PM UTC in reply to Gerd Degens from 06:02 PM:

Would it cost you a lot of effort to program the variant?

It probably would. Because, as you say, the rules are rather unusual. So it is not just a matter of using an existing program, and telling it how large the board is and how the pieces should move this time. Not having Pawns, or allowing captures only from a limited board zone is not so much of a problem. But having a neutral piece that can be moved by both players goes completely against the logic of any program I have. And that it is the royal piece makes this ever so much worse. So I would pretty much have to start from scratch.

To implement Duck Chess, which is also quite unusual (but in a completely different way) took me about 3 weeks. I considered that acceptable because it is a variant that already enjoys a large popularity on several chess servers. And because as a spin off it would also give me Blue Chip Chess and Refusal Chess, which are similar. But for a unique variant, that perhaps no one will ever play...


Edit Form

Comment on the page Borderline

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.