Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Sat, Nov 22, 2003 08:39 PM UTC:
I have two ideas for how the tournament can be run. One is to do it as a
set of concurrent sub-tournaments. Each sub-tournament would focus on a
single game, and it would consist of a series of elimination rounds to
determine a champion. The champion of the tournament as a whole would be
whoever is champion of the most sub-tournaments. Prizes would be awarded
for championship in each sub-tournament, and a bonus prize would be given
for winning the whole tournament. By this method, winners would play more
games than losers.

The other idea is for everyone to play the same number of games. Points
would be given for each win or draw, and the whoever scored the most
points would win the tournament. This is how the last multivariant
tournament was done.

With each method, appropriate methods of tie-breaking would be employed if
needed. Let me know your thoughts on which method you prefer and what
reasons you have for favoring one or the other.

Edit Form

Comment on the page Game Courier Tournament #1

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.