Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
H. G. Muller wrote on Wed, Nov 1, 2017 09:35 PM UTC:

A normal Chess engine should play this game disastrously poorly. It would be very easy to trick it. E.g. it will suppose its pieces are sufficiently protected when they are once protected, and attacked only by a single more valuable piece. E.g. wait until he moves up a Knight, protected by a Pawn. Than attack that Knight with your Queen. The engine will ignore it. It will also think QxN will not be your best move, as it sacs a Queen. So it will let you play that. Then it will try to recapture PxQ, and you refuse that. Bye bye, Knight. Repeat for the other Knight. And then Bishops...

It should indeed be very simple to modify an existing engine to play it. Just make it keep track of the score of the best two moves in each position, rather than only the best, and take the score of the second move as the score for the position. This will need a pair of moves to refute a line, rather than one, so it will increase the branching ratio by a factor sqrt(2), so you will lose some depth. To optimally use a transposition table it will have to hold the pair of refuting moves, rather than just the best. This shpuld be pretty trivial.


Edit Form

Comment on the page Refusal Chess

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.