Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
H. G. Muller wrote on Mon, Oct 13, 2014 06:52 PM UTC:
I am in doubt now whether the Ancaa wouldn't be a better Queen replacement
than BDD. The later is color bound, so I added an color-changing
non-capture to it to make sure it still would have mating potential with
either of the other two color-bound pieces. But an Ancaa is a color
alternator, and would not need such a trick. Which makes it look a much
cleaner piece.

The only argument against it would be that it looks too much like the piece
I had in mind as Rook replacement, the WN. Although the latter jumps to the
N squares, while the Ancaa can be blocked on F squares.

So I was also looking for an alternative for the WN. One possibility for a
strong piece without mating potential is the Gnu (NC). But it is a
16-mover, which would make it significantly stronger than a Rook, while the
forward 3-leaps are also not recommended. So I might make it a sort of
sliding Gnu, which can reach the C squares only via the N squares (but
still jumps directly to the N squares). This is not too much stronger than
a Rook, and it takes the sting out of the forward C moves.

Edit Form
Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.