Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Anonymous wrote on Sat, May 22, 2010 02:18 PM UTC:Average ★★★
Ok, so I really like the basic concept (which is to say, shogi with
pokemon.  Esp. since your handling seems to imply that one major way to do
this is as a form of 'chess with different armies'), but this does suffer
from a number of issues.  

For one thing, it does seem to suffer from a shortage of pokemon/items.  I
realize you were planning to change that in the future, though, and it's
not like other people can't make their own pokemon, so I won't agonize
over it.  

Moreover, I don't really understand the purpose of the bizarre capturing
rules (IE: what happens when a pokemon captures a promoted bushido, what
happens when a bushido captures a pokemon, etc.  A lot of it seems like
just needlessly nerfing the bushido while adding unnecessary complexity to
the game).  

Also, I may be misunderstanding, but it seems to me that the pokemon
aren't really very well balanced against each other (which is an issue if
people are using the 'random' set up).  

But with a little work it could at least be fun, so...

Edit Form

Comment on the page Shogi With Pokémons

Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.