Enter Your Reply The Comment You're Replying To H. G. Muller wrote on Sun, Oct 5, 2008 11:11 AM UTC:Well, the person selling these does not do it for profit (he is retired), so my guess is this is close to manufacturing cost. I am not sure what you mean by 'cover all piece types'. What is 'all'? The number of possible piece types is unlimited, but except for the orthodox Chess pieces no Staunton shape is defined for any of them. People do not even agree about how they should be called, so taking a shape that could be considered a logical representation for that name is already a hopeless task. So any unorthodox piece can represent what you want it to represent. If there are enough different models, you won't have too much trouble picking a subset for playing any given variant. Btw, about the Superchess software: I have instructions available in English for that, on my website: http://home.hccnet.nl/h.g.muller/superE.html . Edit Form You may not post a new comment, because ItemID NextChess does not match any item.