Enter Your Reply The Comment You're Replying To Rich Hutnik wrote on Fri, Oct 3, 2008 08:20 PM UTC:Some more comments for today: 1. George, I did get your email, but did you get any reply back? I am not sure what is up. Please let me know. 2. In regards to having some organization, with large funds, that will somehow back a brand new campaign to covert large numbers over, anyone know where this organization is supposed to get money from? I understand the interest there in this, but where is it realistically? I would say the organizations on the planet now that MIGHT be able to approach what you have are: International Mind Sports Association (IMSA), the British Chess Variants Society, the CV Website, and IAGO. If you look at these, you see: A. IMSA is backed by FIDE. NO WAY you will get revolt organization supporting it. B. The British Chess Variants Society apparently has NO interest in the Next Chess project at all. Such discussions was seen as disruptive and horrible. C. The CV Website. Hello everyone here! Can anyone here see any form of consensus being formed over ANYTHING on here? If the CV website happens to act here, then it needs to actually get behind some project and come up with some standards that can be agreed to and used. If that doesn't manifest, then this site will just be a bunch of individuals who want to be creative 'Arteests' (Pinky up) who see creating games as a form of artistic expression. D. IAGO. And in his, you are talking as a driving force behind it and others. You have read my opinions on this, and seen my proposals. I also am aware of what it will take financially, and that will need to involve FIDE chess folks to even have a chance of making it. And the Next Chess is going to have to play nice with the FIDE version, the way Chess960 and others do. IAGO will look to be working with FIDE, the USCF and the entire FIDE Chess audience, so I don't see where disruption will come out of this. 3. Also note that FIDE Chess does represent where the community as a whole has settled. They do have things now that address different issues with the game, so FIDE chess will live on. How long? Well, not sure. But, the mechanics are in place for it to remain so for a LONG time. Support has built around this game. And slight tweaks have given new life, to address issues. These issues being (and their solution): A. Chess takes too long to play, and has to many draws. Speed chess addresses this. B. The opening book is stale. Chess960 addresses this. C. What about team play? There is bughouse. And you can throw in a mix of large numbers of variants here if you want more. I will say you could get a Next Chess project working and have it make progress and be sustainable. However, it isn't going to happen via disruptive evolution. Only way that MIGHT happen is that we get enslaved and some dictator on top forces people to play something else. Anyone want to go for this? I will need to pass here. A simple project would be to come up with a classification and taxonomy system for chess variants, that would work. This may be a place to start. Edit Form You may not post a new comment, because ItemID NextChess does not match any item.