Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

Earlier Reverse Order LaterLatest
Contest to design a chess variant on 43 squares. Missing description[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
Jared wrote on Mon, Nov 18, 2002 01:20 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
I seem to be unable to email either Mr. Bodlaender or Mr. Overby, so I'll
ask my question here:  Is it okay to enter even if you placed highly (like
me) in the 42S contest?

--Jared

📝Glenn Overby II wrote on Mon, Nov 18, 2002 02:52 PM UTC:
The only persons who absolutely may not enter are Hans and I. (In general, editors have been submitting only non-competing entries for the past several contests.) We welcome entries from past prizewinners and newcomers alike.

Carlos Martín wrote on Mon, Feb 3, 2003 09:58 PM UTC:
(Quote:)

'Message from yahoo.com.
Unable to deliver message to the following address(es).

<[email protected]>:
Sorry, your message to [email protected] cannot be delivered. 
This
account is over quota.'

(End quote)

I cannot submit my competing entry!!!!

What shall I do now?

Anonymous wrote on Mon, Feb 3, 2003 11:22 PM UTC:
Carlos, it might help if you sent the entry to the *correct* address:
[email protected]

📝Glenn Overby II wrote on Mon, Feb 3, 2003 11:25 PM UTC:
Mr. Martin:

We have received your Diplomat Chess entry.

We are experiencing problems with mail forwarding at the moment; if the
situation is not cleared up in 48 hours or so I will mail you an alternate
address for your submission.

Glenn Overby
CVP Competitions Editor

Carlos Martín wrote on Tue, Feb 4, 2003 03:48 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
I can promise you that I sent it to the correct address, i.e.
'[email protected]' - then I got the message I quoted in my
previous message. I DIDN'T send it to any '[email protected]'.

I supposed the editors wanted the entries to be re-directed to the other
address (maybe to save storage space or something).

------

What you have received is probably my 'second attempt' to send my entry to
you - I 'summarized' it a bit in case it was a problem of space.

Jared wrote on Thu, Apr 3, 2003 04:33 PM UTC:Good ★★★★
I have also sent an entry to [email protected], and I would like to
know whether anyone got it, or if I should resend it, since I have
received no feedback whatsoever.

--Jared

Peter Aronson wrote on Thu, Apr 3, 2003 05:38 PM UTC:
We got it, Jared, and it's in the queue.

📝Glenn Overby II wrote on Tue, Apr 8, 2003 12:08 PM UTC:
I would like to thank my fellow staff members for picking up the slack for
me during a time of recent personal upheaval.  I believe that all entries
which have been submitted are now posted and linked.

Contestants, thank you for your patience.  The voting instructions will be
posted soon after the April 15th entry deadline, but after the last of any
last-minute entries is posted.  I'm enjoying your creativity so far.

Michael Nelson wrote on Thu, Apr 10, 2003 12:02 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
I am impressed with the overall level of submissions in this contest. Designing a good small variant is <i>much</i> harder than designing a good large variant, and designing a good large variant isn't exactly easy.

William Overington wrote on Sat, Apr 12, 2003 09:01 AM UTC:
Circular forty-three cell chess board with the cell colourings reminiscent
of semiprecious gemstones.

I was recently looking at the following page, authored by Mike Kelley.

http://www.starwars-rpg.net/journal/archive/2000-08/holochess.html

I was also thinking about this present contest and I realized that a
circular board along the general design of the board used in that page
could be constructed with 3 rings each of 14 cells and 1 centre cell so as
to make a board with 43 cells.

I have thus far produced a board and thought about trying to produce an
entry for the contest, though not got too far with that as yet.

So, I thought that I would make the board available now and allow anyone
who wishes to use it as part of an entry to this contest to do so, in the
hope that the board will be used.

It is available at the following address on the web.

http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~ngo/board43r.gif

If the editors of www.chessvariants.com agree to include the graphic in
the www.chessvariants.com webspace the graphic may be copied by them and
included as a board graphic within the www.chessvariants.com webspace.

The design is intended to convey the idea of cells within a gold framework
with the cells paved with rose quartz, jade and lapis lazuli.

I have entitled it as 'Circular forty-three cell chess board with the
cell colourings reminiscent of semiprecious gemstones.' and hope that the
design will be used for some original chess variant games.

William Overington

12 April 2003

William Overington wrote on Sat, Apr 12, 2003 09:39 AM UTC:
I have just noticed the following by Carlos Martín-Fuertes Moreno in the
See also: section.

http://www.chessvariants.com/43.dir/diplomat/diplomat-chess.html

William Overington

12 April 2003

📝Glenn Overby II wrote on Tue, Apr 22, 2003 01:56 AM UTC:
I am working on the page for the last competing entry (Diminuendo) which will make 15. There is also one more set of changes to an existing entry which is on time. All competing entries will be ready for your votes by the announced date of May 1st.

Jared McComb wrote on Fri, May 2, 2003 01:09 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Umm, it's May 2nd, and nothing is going on.

--Jared

📝Glenn Overby II wrote on Fri, May 2, 2003 11:56 PM UTC:
Actually, there's a great deal going on.  At work.  :)  I expect to post
the voting instructions later this weekend.

Glenn

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Sat, May 3, 2003 02:02 AM UTC:
I'm hoping to see ZRFs for more of these games. Some of them can't be handled by the PBM, and many have not been implemented for Zillions. Without the ability to play them with or over the computer, I may not have the opportunity to play some of these games. I might then have to rely on evaluating games without playing them. I expect to do most of my evaluation of games during the last week of May, since I will be grading until then, and I will be teaching a summer course during June.

📝Glenn Overby II wrote on Sat, May 3, 2003 03:18 AM UTC:
Voting instructions have now been posted above.  Just send an email to the
address listed, listing up to 15 games in order of merit and including
your name.

Entrants MUST vote for at least 10 games, and MUST NOT vote for their own
at this stage.

Glenn

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Mon, Jun 2, 2003 01:41 AM UTC:
I would like to request an extention of the deadline for round one. I did not do any evaluating of games this past week, because I was busy preparing for my Summer course, and that course is going to eat up the time I have available in June. I would like to take adequate time to evaluate the games once I have some time to do it, but if the deadline remains what it is, I expect I'll have to offer rankings of the games without taking the time to play them.

Tony Quintanilla wrote on Wed, Jun 4, 2003 12:45 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Excellent set of submissions! Take a look and vote!

Jared McComb wrote on Sat, Jun 14, 2003 01:49 AM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
I voted for the first round!  Can entrants vote in the second round?

--Jared

🕸Fergus Duniho wrote on Fri, Jun 27, 2003 02:45 AM UTC:
Glenn, I just emailed you my votes. Let me know if you don't get them.

Jared McComb wrote on Sat, Jun 28, 2003 02:02 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Can you let me know if you get/don't get mine too?  Thanks.

--Jared

Antoine Fourrière wrote on Sat, Jun 28, 2003 08:54 PM UTC:
I have just cast mine too. Maybe Glenn could write on July 1st to any candidate whose vote is missing, instead of disqualifying him immediately?

Jared McComb wrote on Sun, Jun 29, 2003 05:55 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
I second the motion!

📝Glenn Overby II wrote on Tue, Jul 1, 2003 11:57 AM UTC:
Hi, folks.  Thanks for the good suggestions.  I am over my computer
difficulties, and will be back up to speed very soon.

There are three entrants who have not yet voted.  All voters who mentioned
voting in this thread have their ballots in.

I am allowing until midnight CDT on Sunday, July 6th for those voters, or
any others, to get in their ballots.  Existing ballots may also be changed
up to that time.  I'll count votes on the 7th.

Glenn

25 comments displayed

Earlier Reverse Order LaterLatest

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.