Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

Earlier Reverse Order Later
Lionlike pieces[Subject Thread] [Add Response]
Charles Gilman wrote on Sun, Jan 26, 2014 07:41 AM UTC:
I have been thinking more on the Lion and possible offshoots, this time considering ones that are not enhancements of my Lioncub. One question occurring to me was what intermediate pieces bewtween the Murray Lion and the full Chu Shogi Lion could exist. The leaping Pasha is of course sucn a piece, as the Murray Lion is a leaping Pasha barred from making a noncapturing one-step move. A further intermediate piece that occurred to me was one which like the Murray Lion cannot mix orthogonal and diagonal steps n one moves, but like the full Lion can turn 90° between two steps of the same kind. This I suggest terming the Midway Lion, as it is betwen the two extremes. Midway is also a village where relatives of mine lived many decades ago, near Swadlincote in the Suoth Derbyshire district. Only Ferz destinations can be reached by both one-step and two-step moves, as follows:
2   2   2
 \\ /|\\ /
  3-1-3
 /|\\|/|\\
2-1-2-1-2
 \\|/|\\|/
  3-1-3
 / \\|/ \\
2   2   2
The Midway Lion can in turn be seen as a compound of an orthgonal and a diagonal component, each effectively a Lion confined to each kind of step. For some time I have been trying to devise names of such pieces. Simultaneously I wondered what kind of pieces might suit the names of the imaginary creatures in the first verse of Jabberwocky - Borogove for an orthogonal piece, Rath for a root-2 diagonal one, and Tove for a root-3 diagonal one - and what to call their compounds. Remarkably, only this week did I connect the two trains of thought, naming the Midway Lion's orthogopnal-step(s) component (the Lion's Wellisch and AltOrth hex analogue) the Borogove, its diagonal-step(s) one Rath, and the correspondng piece using steps along root-3 diagonals Tove.

This raised in turn the question of what Lionlike pieces using other mixtures of radial steps might be termed - if the Lion uses King steps, what pieces use Duke and Baron steps? My first thought was to see the Lion as complementary to the Unicorn. No individual step of a Lion move can be in the Unicorn's directions, although a 3d Lion can reach the Unicorn's first-perimeter destinations with a step of each kind at 90° (cubic/hex-prism) or two orthogonal steps at 60° (Tetraheadral/hex-prism). So then I thought about namse to complement the Bishop and Rook respectively. Given that no game designer has managed to use the Rabbit as defined here the name Rabbit might be better deployed as the counterpart to the Lion using Baron steps, in reference to rabbit and rook pie. Thinking of the one using Duke steps was harder - but I persevered as this is the Lion's Glinsky and McCooey hex analogue. It seemed logical to make it a third beast and wondered about Bull, which as well as a beast means a Papal decree, and "bull and bishop" sounded suitably alliterative. Indeed the alliteration would go further with (assuming that Murray and Midway versions apply to all Lionlike pieces) Borogove+Tove=Midway Bull and Rath+Tove=Midway Rabbit. The corresponding pieces for Count, Brassgeneral, and Azuregeneral steps cuold be Bullock, Brassbullock, and Azurebullock, but I am stuck for a diminutive of Rabbit for Heir, Steelgeneral, and Azuregeneral steps. I am also still open to alternative ideas.

Finally the Midway version of a piece could itself be seen as a component of the full piece along with an Alternating version, which would disallow two steps of the same kind within one move. The Alternating Lion is similar to the short-range form of the Double Rhino, but can turn 135° as well as 45°, as follows:

  2   2
  |\\ /|
2-1-3-1-2
 \\|X|X|/
  3-0-3
 /|X|X|\\
2-1-3-1-2
  |/ \\|
  2   2

Charles Gilman wrote on Mon, Jan 27, 2014 07:00 AM UTC:
I still seem to be having some problem with backslashes. I also note that "Tilelioncub" is something of a misnomer for a piece whose move does not include that of the plain Lioncub. Any better ideas for a name? I did wonder wheter a Borogove, Rath, and Tove restricted to moves comprising forward steps should be named after the adjectives applied to the creatures in the poem - Mimsy, Mome, and Slithy, in which case what I misnamed the Tilelioncub might be a Tilemome.

Ben Reiniger wrote on Tue, Jan 28, 2014 05:03 PM UTC:

(Charles:
When you "use html tags", backslashes will be stripped. You can include a backslash in the finished product by using a double-backslash, which I have edited your comment to do, or using the escape code for backslash. Sorry that these methods make your typing of the diagram difficult.

I have also fixed a mismatched i tag in your comment.)


Charles Gilman wrote on Wed, Jan 29, 2014 07:09 AM UTC:
"When you "use html tags", backslashes will be stripped."

I was aware of that in general, I was just a little surprised that it should apply even within a "pre" block, in which no many other special characters such as the return character behave (apparently) normally.


Charles Gilman wrote on Sun, Feb 2, 2014 07:39 AM UTC:
Another question: should I move the Lion and its kin to earlier in the Man and Beast series? If I generalise and it is less of a one-off I can see them fitting in on page 13 or 15. Page 13 would reflect a synergy with Lemurian pieces that goes beyond alliteration, but my first instinct was that page 15 would reflect their strength and complexity better - and has more space. Should I perhaps move Lemurian pieces to page 15 at the same time?

Charles Gilman wrote on Mon, Feb 3, 2014 07:00 AM UTC:
Having reread the relevant pages in detail, and been reminded that I moved my Planetary pieces from page 15 to page 13 within Man and Beast some while ago, I can see that the Lionlike pieces really belong on page 13. I will therefore move them to there when I expand the range of them covered. That just leaves what to call the FO version of the piece that I propose calling Rabbit.

Charles Gilman wrote on Wed, Feb 5, 2014 07:28 AM UTC:
I noticed that the definition of a Lion includes Multiple-Displacer, and therefore it cannot go before Man and Beast 16, the first page to mention that kind of capture. Therefore I will be moving it to that page.

For an FO Rabbit, would the name Bunny be too kitsch? I know that it is not used exclusively for very young rabbits, but it is one use of the diminutive, especially in the alliterative phrase "baby bunnies".


Charles Gilman wrote on Mon, Feb 17, 2014 07:20 AM UTC:
I am still not entirely happy with Bull for the Lion equivalent making moves comprising Duke moves, and Bullock just FO ones. It is tenuous, the meaning is a bit too close to Ox, and of course it would add further to the many names starting with B. I would still be very interested in a better fit - a word that goes with Bishop as well as Lion does with Unicorn.

8 comments displayed

Earlier Reverse Order Later

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.