Derek: '... Please raise the material value of your archbishop within your
CRC model? ...'
If there would be a theoretical explanation of your value estimation
beside of that statistical argument, I will think over my model. For me
it is more interesting to have a well argued and preferred *SIMPLE*
value derivation, even if that would not match all experiences. That is,
because such thoughts also could influence the lay-out of other program
parts e.g. like the detail evaluation.
P.S.: Thus it would be best to present a short and convincing argument.
