Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.


[ Help | Earliest Comments | Latest Comments ]
[ List All Subjects of Discussion | Create New Subject of Discussion ]
[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]

Comments/Ratings for a Single Item

EarliestEarlier Reverse Order Later
Rules of Chess: Pawns FAQ. Rules of promotion and movement of pawns explained.[All Comments] [Add Comment or Rating]
Clark C. wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2005 09:37 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
I have a 'know-it-all' friend who INSISTS that its true that, by the
rules that the official chess masters play, one cannot capture pieces
with
a pawn that has not yet moved.

Besides this site, is there a source that debunks this idea? That is,
just
in case an internet source isn't 'good enough,' are there any books
that
clearly state that this supposed rule is false?

Doug Chatham wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2005 08:31 PM UTC:
If you look at the Pawn diagram on this guide for beginners at the US Chess Federation website, the description says that the White Pawn that hasn't moved yet can attack.

I hope that's authoritative enough for the know-it-all.


Thomas McElmurry wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2005 09:36 PM UTC:
If even the official rules aren't good enough for your friend, how about some actual games played by GMs? For example, check out the last round of the recent FIDE championship; the games can be found at http://chessbase.com/news/2005/sanluis/games/wcch14.htm and probably numerous other places.

In these four games, I count three moves of the type in question: 6. dxc3 in Svidler-Anand, 25. bxc3 in Leko-Kasimjanov, and 50... hxg6 in Morozevich-Adams.

If your friend considers every word on the Internet to be inherently untrustworthy, you might try the local library. Just about any book on chess should contain either the rules or records of games, and you won't have to dig through very many games before finding examples.


Bob wrote on Fri, Nov 4, 2005 08:55 AM UTC:Good ★★★★
Once someone promotes a pawn to a queen but the queen is an upside down rook,which is still a queen, if the opponent captured this queen (upside down rook) the opponent gets the points for capturing a queen. is this true?

Someone wrote on Sun, Nov 6, 2005 08:03 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Before a pawn's promotion:

My knight is blocking a pawn from making a promotion, can my opponent
either capture my knight and promote, 'side-step' my knight and
promote,
or can he not do a thing? This has been quite a discussion because he is
very difinitive that there is such an ability.

Anonymous wrote on Mon, Nov 7, 2005 02:41 AM UTC:
If the knight is directly in front of the pawn, then no, 'Side-stepping' and capturing is not allowed.

Patricia wrote on Thu, Dec 22, 2005 07:44 PM UTC:
Is it possible for the pawn's first move to be an attack? For instance if a pawn was moved forward one space and then diagonally for it's second space on the first move...is that alright?

🕸📝Fergus Duniho wrote on Thu, Dec 22, 2005 11:34 PM UTC:
What you have described is not a legal Pawn move. A Pawn's initial double move is always non-capturing and always straight forward. A Pawn may capture on its first move, but only in the usual way it captures, one space diagonally forward.

hillie wrote on Tue, Feb 28, 2006 09:29 PM UTC:
While I believe I understand 'promotion' quite well, I do not understand how newly promoted pieces are identified. (lacking a replacement 'lost' piece)

David Paulowich wrote on Tue, Feb 28, 2006 10:28 PM UTC:

In a chess tournament spare pieces are usually available. If not, it is customary to use an upside-down rook to represent a second queen. Also, many expensive chess sets come with two White Queens and two Black Queens.


chaitra wrote on Sat, May 13, 2006 07:16 PM UTC:Good ★★★★
if moving a pawn to the other end leads to a check..then can there be a promotion and check together?

Stephen Stockman wrote on Sat, May 13, 2006 11:57 PM UTC:
Absolutely

Anonymous wrote on Thu, Jul 20, 2006 05:59 PM UTC:Good ★★★★

Anonymous wrote on Fri, Nov 23, 2007 12:30 PM UTC:
I have two questions. Does a pawn have to promote when it gets to the other side of the board? And my other question is: when there is for example more than one queen (the second queen from promoting), what is used to take the second queens place?

Art Bergquist wrote on Fri, Feb 20, 2009 06:47 AM UTC:
Please replace the misspelled occurrence of 'alltogether' with the
correctly spelled 'altogether'.

TIA,

Art Bergquist

Anonymous wrote on Sat, Mar 14, 2009 04:56 AM UTC:BelowAverage ★★
you didnt cover en passant...

David Paulowich wrote on Sat, Mar 14, 2009 05:19 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
'For the en passant capture, see the FAQ page for en passant capture.'

Anonymous wrote on Sun, Feb 21, 2010 04:39 PM UTC:Excellent ★★★★★
Thanks for the great advice and tips

Charles Gilman wrote on Mon, Feb 22, 2010 07:38 AM UTC:
Although 'altogether' would be spelled correctly it wouldn't be the correct word for the context. What is required is a space, so that it reads as two words - 'all together'.
	Of course if the page is up for this kind of criticism I could point out that Pawns do not promote. Players promote, and their Pawns are promoted.

bryce wrote on Mon, Mar 1, 2010 11:27 PM UTC:
what is en oposon

Frostman04 wrote on Tue, Mar 29, 2011 06:07 PM UTC:
Ive come across a problem where a pawn is taking my pawn after my pawn
jumps two spaces and lands next to the pawn that is overtaking me.

consider the situation
Black pawn on B2
White pawn on A4

Black pawn moves to B4
White pawn takes black pawn by sliding to B3

I've found this problem in a few online chess games.

Clarify for me if this is actually allowed to happen or not please.

Based on my chess experience, i was under the impression pawns could not be
taken by another pawn unless it was across from it.  say...

Black pawn on A3
White pawn on B2

Whoever's turn it was could take the opposing pawn.

But the situation above i would need clarifying. Thanks :)

H. G. Muller wrote on Wed, Mar 30, 2011 02:46 PM UTC:
Yes, that is allowed, and called 'en passant' capture. It was added to chess at the same time as the rule that pawns were allowed to make a double step, to prevent they could abuse that to pass a Pawn they could not have safely passed with only single steps.

M Winther wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2011 05:41 AM UTC:
It is important to point out that 'en passant' can only be performed in the move immediately following the double-step move. This is the only chance to capture 'en passant'. It can't be done in the following moves. 
/Mats

peace wrote on Mon, Feb 23, 2015 01:44 AM UTC:Average ★★★
You gave pawn FAQ but didn't include en passant. Which should be shown with response to pawn's first move. If your pawn is on its 5th rank and a person moves adjacent to the left or right of your pawn (its 4th rank) on you next turn only you can take that pawn because it had to move through attack.

[Editor's note: Thank you for your comment. We actually link here to a page on En Passant but it would be good to describe them in brief, perhaps with the language you use. Would be good to add some animation illustrating en passant too. Thanks again.]


David Paulowich wrote on Sun, Apr 30, 2023 01:06 AM UTC:

diagram

White can achieve a draw in this position by promoting the pawn to a knight (with check) and taking the Black queen on his next turn. While the knight can eventually capture all three Black pawns, it is not capable of checkmate on its own. Any good computer will demonstrate that promoting the pawn to a queen loses against best play. Stockfish even begins by setting a little trap: 1. c8=Q Qg7 and if 2. Kxb4 Qb2 checkmate (see the diagram below).

diagram


25 comments displayed

EarliestEarlier Reverse Order Later

Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.