[ List Earliest Comments Only For Pages | Games | Rated Pages | Rated Games | Subjects of Discussion ]
Comments by Garth Wallace
Funny that this page doesn't even mention the Maharajah, even though Maharajah redirects here from the Piececlopedia.
Does this belong in the Piececlopedia? It seems to only be used in Quantum Chess.
Idle thoughts: we can consider a dynamic piece to be 'relative positional' if its move is determined by its position relative to other pieces. Mimes would be a subset. An 'absolute positional' dynamic piece would then be one with a move determined by its coordinates without regard to other pieces: the zelig would fall in this category. Imitators are 'relative temporal' (determined by time after an event). An 'absolute temporal' piece would then be one that has a move determined by how many plies have passed since the start of the game. The pieces of Flip Chess/Shogi are neither, since the player chooses the change. Discretional?
Is the mirror-rhino really worth less than a rhino? I would have thought that the fact that it is not color-switching and can return to its starting space in an odd number of moves would give it a boost.
Whoops, I was thinking of the one-step versions, but that passage is about the sliding versions. My mistake!
I would say that 2.Na6 would be moving into check and hence illegal. No idea if this interpretation was the rule actually in use historically, but it seems to follow logically from the rules as stated,
I'm curious: what is the nightknight?
This page describes the piece from Gygax's DragonChess, but the summary in listings is 'Combines pawn and knight movement. (Mainly as a problem piece, not found in variants).' There is a different article on the problem piece.
One possibility for limiting the queen in this case is to allow it to 'bounce' only as the component used to move to the trampoline. So if it slides to the trampoline orthagonally, it can only move away orthagonally, and if it moves to the trampoline diagonally, it can only move away diagonally. In other words, the queen could only move like a rook or like a bishop on a single turn.
'Pokemon' is an invariant plural (as has been pointed out before), unless you are a LOLcat. Also, Japanese is a language and an ethnicity, but not a location. And finally, calling a piece a 'bushido' is like calling a piece a 'chivalry' or an 'existentialism'. Rating this poor because, aside from language issues, it is unplayable as written. Literally. It simply does not give enough information for somebody to be able to play a game of it.
Good goofy fun. Also, props for namedropping Girl Genius! ;) One question, though: the instructions specifically say that you can attach a move part to an enemy piece, but why would you do that? I can't think of any situation where that would it would be advantageous to do that: it deprives you of a part you could add to one of your pieces, and gives your opponent more options. There's no real impetus to dispose of parts you can't use in this way (even spoilage is preferable, I would think). Was this rule included only to fit the theme, or does it have a real impact on gameplay? A variation might be to have grafts remain under the control of the player who added them, regardless of who originally owned the piece. So if black grafted a fers to a white knight, he could move that piece as a fers (but not as a knight), potentially capturing a white piece. What's more mad-sciencey than mind control? Shades of The Other... Of course, this ruleset could easily be applied to any of the various capablancoid large-army variants. And what about alfil & dabbabah components, or some way of breaking down bent riders? The potential for new crimes against nature seems limitless!
The link for Nine Queens Chess is broken (there's an extra .html at the end) The link to Pink Panther Chess is also broken, but I'm not sure what the problem is there.
To belatedly answer Charles Gilman's question about yo vs. yon: those lists of numbers in Japanese tend to gloss over a lot of things. Japanese actually has two full sets of numerals, one native and one originally borrowed from Chinese, but uses the same kanji for both (Japanese actually does this for a lot of things besides numbers: most kanji have both on-yomi, or Chinese readings, and kun-yomi, or Japanese readings, and may have more than one of each). The set used most commonly is the Sino-Japanese set: ichi, ni, san, shi, go, roku, shichi, hachi, kyuu, juu. In the modern language the native terms are more obscure (but do show up in certain restricted contexts, such as the 'tsu' counter and the first few counters for people) with the exception of 'yon' (4) and 'nana' (7), which are more or less interchangeable with the Sino-Japanese numerals when used stand-alone. In most kun-yomi compounds, though, the kanji meaning 4 appears as 'yo', sometimes doubling the following consonant (as in 'yottsu', 'four things'). I don't know the history of the language that well, but if I were to guess I'd say that 'yo' is the original form (or derived directly from the original form), and the '-n' was added just to the form that is used stand-alone and in compounds with on-yomi. 'Yon' is about as common as 'shi' (unlike most other numbers) because 'shi' is also an on-yomi for the kanji meaning 'die', and is therefore considered unlucky. This homophony was inherited when the kanji and their on-yomi were borrowed from Chinese, which has the same superstition about the number 4. Not sure why 'nana' is also an exception. There is no kanji with the reading 'n'. All of them can function as a complete syllable. (Syllable-final 'n' in Japanese is sometimes referred to as 'syllabic N' but it really isn't, it just gets its own kana unlike the syllable-initial N, and makes the syllable long)
The rules of Ajax Orthodox Chess specifically state that the Minister may capture with its one-step move. The different colors are probably to show that it leaps to the 2nd perimeter rather than blockably sliding.
Idle thoughts: taking the name 'trampoline' literally, allow a slider continuing across a trampoline without changing direction to move as a hopper. I wonder if it'd make the trampoline too powerful though. Also, hybrid Trampoline/Pole Chess? (TramPoleIne?) One piece expands move options, the other restricts...
The links to Game Courier ('Play' and 'Play by email' are broken. They point to play.chessvariants.com (which doesn't exist), not play. chessvariants.org
Also, 'Commented items' gives the message 'Error performing query: Column 'IsDeleted' in where clause is ambiguous'
The link currently leads to a domain squatter.
Except the point of Big Board Chess seems to be to use conventional pieces on a larger board and to eliminate openings in favor of a setup phase. Introducing (relatively) exotic pieces and forcing the setup into a compact men-behind-pawns, king-and-queen-in-the-middle arrangement (necessitating openings, albeit a more Chess960-like variety) seems to be going against the purpose of Big Board. You end up with yet another decimal chess variant, possibly a good one but unlike Big Board in spirit.
Gollon may not be far off translating 'shi' as 'Mandarin'. A Mandarin *is* a minister or counselor, and the term itself ultimately derives from Sanskrit 'mantri' (via Portuguese and Malay).
Conflating nonmoving board features with noncapturing pieces doesn't make a lot of sense to me. The only overlap seems to be the Tardis, which is a bit of board topology that can be moved by the player.
Just a suggestion, George: could you put the name of the latest addition in the list in boldface so it's easier to see where youve ranked it? The list is getting pretty long and increasingly difficult to locate things in.
This list gives 'catapult' as a piece in xiangqi. I assume that refers to the cannon?
Some things are unclear here. The knight is partly lame (only able to leap over opposing pieces), so we need to know which spaces it passes over: can it be blocked by a friendly piece on an orthagonally adjacent square? A diagonally adjacent square? Also, the archer's rifle capture can be used against any piece 5 squares away in a straight line, but is that limited to the queenwise directions or any angle (can it capture at a (1,2))?
25 comments displayed
Permalink to the exact comments currently displayed.