Check out Atomic Chess, our featured variant for November, 2024.

Enter Your Reply

The Comment You're Replying To
Derek Nalls wrote on Fri, May 23, 2008 10:22 PM UTC:
'If the result would be different from playing at a a more 'normal' TC,
like one or two hours per game, it would only mean that any conclusions 
you draw on them would be irrelevant for playing Chess at normal TC.'

Conclusions drawn from playing at normal time controls are irrelevant
compared to extremely-long time controls.  It is desirable to see what
secrets can be discovered from a rarely viewed vantage of extremely
well-played games.  Are not you interested at all to analyze move-by-move
games played better than almost any pair of human players are capable?

You do not seem to understand that I, too, am discontent with the
probability of a small number of wins or losses in a row.  This is a
compensation that reduces the chance that the games were randomly
played to the greatest extent attainable and consequently, the winner 
or loser randomly determined.
_____________________________

'... playing 2 games will be like flipping a coin.'

Correction-

Playing 1 game will be like flipping a coin ... once.
Playing 2 games will be like flipping a coin ... twice.

The chance of getting the same flip (heads or tails) twice-in-a-row is
1/4.  Not impressive but a decent beginning.  Add a couple or a few or several consecutive same flips and it departs 'luck' by a huge margin.
_______________________________________________________________

'The result, whatever it is, will not prove anything, as it would be
different if you would repeat the test. Experiments that do not give a
fixed outcome will tell you nothing, unless you conduct enough of them to
get a good impression on the probability for each outcome to occur.'

I have wondered why the performance of computer chess programs is
unpredictable and varied even under identical controls.  Despite their
extraordinary complexity, I think of computer hardware, operating systems
and applications (such as Joker80) as deterministic.

The details of the differences in outcomes do not concern me.  In fact,
to the extent that your remarks are true, they will support my case if my
playtesting is successful that the unlikelihood of achieving the same
outcome (i.e., wins or losses for one player) is extreme.

I am pleased to report that I estimate it will be possible, over time, to
generate enough experiments using Joker80 to have meaning for a
high-quality, low-quantity advocate (such as myself) and even a
moderate-quality, moderate-quantity advocate (such as Scharnagl).  As for
a low-quality, high-quantity advocate (such as you), you will always be
disappointed as you are impossible to please.

Edit Form
Conduct Guidelines
This is a Chess variants website, not a general forum.
Please limit your comments to Chess variants or the operation of this site.
Keep this website a safe space for Chess variant hobbyists of all stripes.
Because we want people to feel comfortable here no matter what their political or religious beliefs might be, we ask you to avoid discussing politics, religion, or other controversial subjects here. No matter how passionately you feel about any of these subjects, just take it someplace else.
Avoid Inflammatory Comments
If you are feeling anger, keep it to yourself until you calm down. Avoid insulting, blaming, or attacking someone you are angry with. Focus criticisms on ideas rather than people, and understand that criticisms of your ideas are not personal attacks and do not justify an inflammatory response.
Quick Markdown Guide

By default, new comments may be entered as Markdown, simple markup syntax designed to be readable and not look like markup. Comments stored as Markdown will be converted to HTML by Parsedown before displaying them. This follows the Github Flavored Markdown Spec with support for Markdown Extra. For a good overview of Markdown in general, check out the Markdown Guide. Here is a quick comparison of some commonly used Markdown with the rendered result:

Top level header: <H1>

Block quote

Second paragraph in block quote

First Paragraph of response. Italics, bold, and bold italics.

Second Paragraph after blank line. Here is some HTML code mixed in with the Markdown, and here is the same <U>HTML code</U> enclosed by backticks.

Secondary Header: <H2>

  • Unordered list item
  • Second unordered list item
  • New unordered list
    • Nested list item

Third Level header <H3>

  1. An ordered list item.
  2. A second ordered list item with the same number.
  3. A third ordered list item.
Here is some preformatted text.
  This line begins with some indentation.
    This begins with even more indentation.
And this line has no indentation.

Alt text for a graphic image

A definition list
A list of terms, each with one or more definitions following it.
An HTML construct using the tags <DL>, <DT> and <DD>.
A term
Its definition after a colon.
A second definition.
A third definition.
Another term following a blank line
The definition of that term.